It has been awhile (again) since I have posted anything on this blog. I don't know why, but, I feel compelled to write something agriculturally related!
Perhaps it is the approach of Spring that has me thinking agriculture. I flew over the Flint Hills today as American Airlines took me from DFW to Omaha and saw several burned places as well as burning grasslands. It is the time of year when ranchers are preparing for Spring rains and the renewing of the grasslands.
Burning the prairie to control the noxious weeds and brush is still commonly practiced in the Flint Hills. It should be practiced in a lot of other places too, but, it isn't. Brush has invaded much of the former grazing lands where buffalo once roamed -- from Texas to the Dakotas. There does seem to be renewed interest in controlled burning though. I'd really like to see it happen. The problem is, the uninformed will complain about the smoke in the air.
It is amazing to me how people have lost touch with the land and the source of their food supply. Urban sprawl and misguided government programs have cost much of the land that used to be the home to beef cattle. That land today is growing houses or invasive weed, brush and tree species because it is in a "conservation" program of some sort. Ranchers generally do an exceptional job of managing land the way it should be managed. Using grazing species of animals to harvest grass and control invasive species is the way God designed it. Instead, it now takes an army of people to do what a good rancher can accomplish by himself and maybe a couple of hired hands.
I guess when the price of beef gets too high, people might start to see things differently. But, I guess that's the agenda of the Vegans and Vegetarians anyway -- cause the price of beef to increase until people can't afford to eat it. Doesn't that make a lot of sense? Make high-quality protein unaffordable to people who need it. Sounds like a pretty elitist attitude to me.
But, there is the argument that the world can't feed itself if so much of the agricultural capacity is utilized for producing protein from inefficient sources like cattle. I have several problems with that. First, cattle are extremely efficient utilizers of forage that is unusable by humans unless converted to meat first. Second, the reason people are starving in the world has nothing to do with beef cattle in the U.S. or other places. It's more about corruption and poor governance. Third, the force driving food prices and availability, etc. is fuel prices and policies. Oil is the energy choice most easily utilized for producing food. Or, we could go back to human and animal labor if you prefer (and some think we should). So, what does our government do? It uses some of that food produced using oil to create an additive (alcohol) to add to the oil used to produce it. How does that make sense? Talk about inefficient utilization!
Arrgh....too many interwoven issues -- all of them created by misguided people with misguided policies. If I didn't know better, I'd think the Devil himself was trying to make it as difficult as possible for farmers and ranchers to do their job. Malnourished people are much more likely to fall for his schemes than are healthy, happy ones. Besides, misery is his stock in trade.....
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energy. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Regulating Cattle Emissions and Conspiracy Theories
OK. I’ve finally had enough of the ludicrous idea that the way to control greenhouse gases is to regulate emissions by livestock. I suspect it is really a plan to destroy the livestock industry by those who think we should all become Vegans. Or, maybe it is something even more sinister.
The carbon cycle is relatively simple to describe although its actions are complex. Living things are carbon-based. This includes plants and animals. Plants take carbon-dioxide out of the atmosphere, trap the carbon into their tissue in the form of various molecules such as sugars and then release Oxygen. Animals eat plants (or other animals) and through the process of digestion, break down the complex molecules (such as sugars) from the plant material and utilize the released energy to fuel their existence. In the process of digestion, some of the carbon is released back into the atmosphere as various gases and carbon dioxide is released through respiration. This process cycles the carbon in a somewhat continuous loop. Plants also release carbon when they die. The process of decomposition releases carbon into the atmosphere.
This carbon cycle has continued since the beginning of life on this planet. At one time in pre-history, there was significantly more carbon floating around in the atmosphere which fueled riotous growth of plants. Many of those plants were then trapped in sediment and over time changed to oil, gas and coal or were bound into limestone and other sedimentary rocks.
Until we began releasing the carbon that was “sequestered” in the form of oil, gas and coal, carbon wasn’t a problem. It was cycled through plants and animals just as it is today. It was this release from the utilization of fossil fuels of huge amounts of carbon back into the carbon cycle that created what some scientists today are claiming to be a cataclysmic problem for life on earth. In other words – it isn’t the cattle that are causing “climate change,” it is the burning of fossil fuels that released huge amounts of trapped carbon into the atmosphere that is causing the increase of atmospheric greenhouse gases.
So, why do our government and the governments of other nations throughout the world think the solution lies in regulating gas produced by cattle? Here is one possibility – it is part of the plan to control the world food supply. In the U.S. most crops are subsidized through various support payments. Livestock production is not. Placing regulations on the livestock producers under the guise of controlling greenhouse gas emissions makes sense only in the context of attempting to gain control of one of the few lightly regulated industries left.
It fits into what could be construed as a plan to force a one-world government. The way I see it, if one wanted to control the world you would begin with a series of induced crises. The crises would be designed to gain control of some key things – banking, energy and food. Hmmmm…..we recently saw manipulation of the first two of these items. That leaves food. I wonder what’s really going on behind the scenes in Copenhagen……
The carbon cycle is relatively simple to describe although its actions are complex. Living things are carbon-based. This includes plants and animals. Plants take carbon-dioxide out of the atmosphere, trap the carbon into their tissue in the form of various molecules such as sugars and then release Oxygen. Animals eat plants (or other animals) and through the process of digestion, break down the complex molecules (such as sugars) from the plant material and utilize the released energy to fuel their existence. In the process of digestion, some of the carbon is released back into the atmosphere as various gases and carbon dioxide is released through respiration. This process cycles the carbon in a somewhat continuous loop. Plants also release carbon when they die. The process of decomposition releases carbon into the atmosphere.
This carbon cycle has continued since the beginning of life on this planet. At one time in pre-history, there was significantly more carbon floating around in the atmosphere which fueled riotous growth of plants. Many of those plants were then trapped in sediment and over time changed to oil, gas and coal or were bound into limestone and other sedimentary rocks.
Until we began releasing the carbon that was “sequestered” in the form of oil, gas and coal, carbon wasn’t a problem. It was cycled through plants and animals just as it is today. It was this release from the utilization of fossil fuels of huge amounts of carbon back into the carbon cycle that created what some scientists today are claiming to be a cataclysmic problem for life on earth. In other words – it isn’t the cattle that are causing “climate change,” it is the burning of fossil fuels that released huge amounts of trapped carbon into the atmosphere that is causing the increase of atmospheric greenhouse gases.
So, why do our government and the governments of other nations throughout the world think the solution lies in regulating gas produced by cattle? Here is one possibility – it is part of the plan to control the world food supply. In the U.S. most crops are subsidized through various support payments. Livestock production is not. Placing regulations on the livestock producers under the guise of controlling greenhouse gas emissions makes sense only in the context of attempting to gain control of one of the few lightly regulated industries left.
It fits into what could be construed as a plan to force a one-world government. The way I see it, if one wanted to control the world you would begin with a series of induced crises. The crises would be designed to gain control of some key things – banking, energy and food. Hmmmm…..we recently saw manipulation of the first two of these items. That leaves food. I wonder what’s really going on behind the scenes in Copenhagen……
Labels:
agriculture,
Al Gore,
big government,
cattle,
energy,
livestock
Friday, January 2, 2009
Texas Energy Efficiency Study
It makes good economic sense to be as efficient as possible with power usage. We just completed installation of a new central heating and cooling system in our home. With the technological improvements since our previous unit was built, we should save about 40% on our electricity usage with the new unit. It will pay for itself in less than 10 years at that rate.
Electricity study embraces energy efficiency for state
Electricity study embraces energy efficiency for state
Labels:
efficiency,
electricity,
energy
The Winds of Nicaragua
For some energy-starved countries, wind is becoming an increasingly important source of power.
Nicaragua adds wind power to energy mix
Nicaragua adds wind power to energy mix
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
Nicaragua,
wind power
Summary of Poznan Climate Conference
The following is a link to:
COP14—PoznaĆ Climate Conference Summary
Whatever your thoughts on climate change, it has definitely become a part of our world economic situation.
COP14—PoznaĆ Climate Conference Summary
Whatever your thoughts on climate change, it has definitely become a part of our world economic situation.
Labels:
agriculture,
climate change,
conservation,
energy
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Ethanol Consolidation Appears to be Beginning
It was only a matter of time given the tight or non-existent margins in the ethanol industry. Much of the initial capital came into ethanol companies because of favorable tax incentives. Now we will see consolidation.
I suspect that we are only beginning the first wave of consolidation. It will be driven by the most efficient current producers. The second wave will see the major oil companies entry.
First signs of consolidation in ethanol industry
I suspect that we are only beginning the first wave of consolidation. It will be driven by the most efficient current producers. The second wave will see the major oil companies entry.
First signs of consolidation in ethanol industry
Labels:
agriculture,
energy,
ethanol
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
BLM Rules on Oil Shale Development
It will take all forms and sources of energy to achieve energy independence. This one will be more controversial than some of the others, but needs to be part of the solution.
Bureau of Land Management Finalizes Rules That Could Add Billions of Barrels of Oil to U.S. Supply
Bureau of Land Management Finalizes Rules That Could Add Billions of Barrels of Oil to U.S. Supply
Labels:
conservation,
energy,
environment
Friday, November 14, 2008
Adapting the Texas Energy Grid to Wind
Managing the power grids for variability in wind power generation continues to be an area of opportunity for the new energy economy. Texas is leading the way in adjusting to that variability because of its dominance in the industry. The article linked below discusses some of the things being done to handle the variability.
Texas Adjusts Its Grid for Wind
Texas Adjusts Its Grid for Wind
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
Texas,
wind power
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Natural Gas Hydrates in Alaska
Any wagers on the Democrat controlled Congress and White House of the next administration allowing the development of this resource?
Gas Hydrates on Alaska’s North Slope Hold One of Nation’s Largest Deposits of Technically Recoverable Natural Gas
Secretary Kempthorne Releases USGS Assessment, Says Gas Hydrates Could Significantly Add to U.S. Energy Mix
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne and U.S. Geological Survey Director Mark Myers today released a USGS assessment estimating that there are 85.4 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas from natural gas hydrates on the Alaskan North Slope. This would be enough natural gas to heat more than 100 million average homes for 10 years, according to current usage rates provided by the Energy Information Administration. However, further research, including long-term production tests, still is needed to demonstrate gas hydrates as an economically producible resource.
“The assessment points to a...(complete article here).
Gas Hydrates on Alaska’s North Slope Hold One of Nation’s Largest Deposits of Technically Recoverable Natural Gas
Secretary Kempthorne Releases USGS Assessment, Says Gas Hydrates Could Significantly Add to U.S. Energy Mix
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne and U.S. Geological Survey Director Mark Myers today released a USGS assessment estimating that there are 85.4 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas from natural gas hydrates on the Alaskan North Slope. This would be enough natural gas to heat more than 100 million average homes for 10 years, according to current usage rates provided by the Energy Information Administration. However, further research, including long-term production tests, still is needed to demonstrate gas hydrates as an economically producible resource.
“The assessment points to a...(complete article here).
Labels:
Alaska,
energy,
natural gas
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Achieving Energy Independence Overestimated
In the Houston Chronicle is a great article about energy independence titled "Energy `independence' is easier said than done" (click on the link to view it.) It discusses the global nature of the oil business and how energy flows around the planet. It also points out some issues regarding energy security that are relevant to the discussion. I highly recommend the article.
Until we truly have alternative energy sources that can replace oil, we will not be energy independent. We must look beyond fuels like ethanol and biodiesel to radically new technologies. We need to be thinking "science-fiction-like" technology, not a re-hash of the same old thing. The future will belong to the engineers and scientists who develop the new "power pack" that will power the future.
Until we truly have alternative energy sources that can replace oil, we will not be energy independent. We must look beyond fuels like ethanol and biodiesel to radically new technologies. We need to be thinking "science-fiction-like" technology, not a re-hash of the same old thing. The future will belong to the engineers and scientists who develop the new "power pack" that will power the future.
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
independence,
oil
Thursday, November 6, 2008
The Cost of Greening California
Someone else is finally seeing the big picture of renewables. California is "broke" already. Now, they will ask their taxpayers to make the "Green Moguls" wealthier.
California study shows high cost of renewable power
California study shows high cost of renewable power
Labels:
alternative energy,
conservation,
energy,
environment,
ethanol,
wind power
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Better Air and Consistent Growth Through Partnership
Texas often gets a bad rap from other parts of the nation due to the stereotypical image of oil-guzzling rednecks that is often associated with the state. In reality, Texas is leading the nation in development of alternative energy technology and in reducing pollutants in our atmosphere. The free-enterprise, private-initiative attitude of the state in which private industry and government entities can partner to achieve common goals is a model that should be emulated by the rest of the nation. Cooperative efforts, rather than burdensome regulation, are key to the successes.
As North Texas grows, air becomes cleaner
Release date: 10/28/2008
Contact Information: Dave Bary or Tressa Tillman at 214-665-2200 or r6press@epa.gov
(Dallas, Texas – October 28, 2008) As the Dallas-Fort Worth area’s economy has grown to one of the nation’s most vibrant, its citizens have also enjoyed improvements in air quality. This summer saw the lowest levels of ozone in three decades, thanks to a campaign to reduce air pollution led by the...(complete news release here).
As North Texas grows, air becomes cleaner
Release date: 10/28/2008
Contact Information: Dave Bary or Tressa Tillman at 214-665-2200 or r6press@epa.gov
(Dallas, Texas – October 28, 2008) As the Dallas-Fort Worth area’s economy has grown to one of the nation’s most vibrant, its citizens have also enjoyed improvements in air quality. This summer saw the lowest levels of ozone in three decades, thanks to a campaign to reduce air pollution led by the...(complete news release here).
Labels:
alternative energy,
conservation,
energy,
environment,
pollution,
regulations,
Texas
Highe Cost Infrastructure Impacts Wind Generation
As we gain new information with the passage of time, we often learn that our best laid plans are more costly than anticipated. Such seems to be the case in Texas according to a new study of the costs of building high-capacity wind generation infrastructure within the state.
Texas study cites high cost of harnessing wind
Texas study cites high cost of harnessing wind
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
infrastructure,
power grid,
wind power
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
New Jersey: Garbage to Fuel Source
Good for New Jersey. All of the large metropolitan areas need to be utilizing their decomposing garbage for fuel.
Green Garbage: Trash Becoming Key Power Source in New Jersey
Green Garbage: Trash Becoming Key Power Source in New Jersey
Labels:
alternative energy,
conservation,
energy,
environment,
garbage,
methane
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Wind Development Continues to Challenge Power Grid
As I traveled across Texas this week I was amazed at the dramatic increase in the number of wind generators. The stretch from north of Snyder, Texas, to Abilene, Texas, is becoming one continuous wind power generating field. The grid still is not able to fully utilize all of that power -- and there is more being built -- especially futher north into the Texas Panhandle and on up through the High Plains of Kansas and Nebraska. The article linked below discusses some of the grid issues.
Wind development seen biggest challenge for power grid
Wind development seen biggest challenge for power grid
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
infrastructure,
power grid,
wind power
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Biofuel Waste to Riches
Potential new bi-products from biofuel waste may revolutionize the biofuel industry.
Adding Value to Biofuel Waste
What do you get when you cross E. coli with biofuel waste products? A new process that may revolutionize the economic development of the growing biofuel industry.
Biofuels represent the best sustainable, secure, and renewable alternative to fossil fuels. Unfortunately, biofuel production is beset by the same problem as traditional petroleum refining – excess waste. In traditional refining, only about...(complete article here).
Adding Value to Biofuel Waste
What do you get when you cross E. coli with biofuel waste products? A new process that may revolutionize the economic development of the growing biofuel industry.
Biofuels represent the best sustainable, secure, and renewable alternative to fossil fuels. Unfortunately, biofuel production is beset by the same problem as traditional petroleum refining – excess waste. In traditional refining, only about...(complete article here).
Labels:
agriculture,
alternative energy,
bio-fuels,
conservation,
energy
Ethanol Subsidy Market Distortions
Iowa State takes a different look at the impact of ethanol.
Ethanol: A Welfare-Increasing Market Distortion?
Xiaodong Du, Dermot J. Hayes, Mindy L. BakerOctober 2008 [08-WP 480]
This study estimates the welfare changes for consumers and producers resulting from ethanol production and related support polices in 2007. The results suggest a positive welfare gain from the support policies; this is possible because ethanol subsidies effectively replaced a market distortion that had a larger deadweight loss. Previous farm subsidies created overproduction, which then depressed market prices and increased the cost of maintaining target-price supports. Ethanol polices resulted in additional ethanol production, but because this additional ethanol was sold in price elastic energy markets, the price depressing impact of the government supports was less than before. This resulted in lower government spending and a net welfare gain of $2.65 billion for given market parameters. The results are...(complete news release and link to study here).
Ethanol: A Welfare-Increasing Market Distortion?
Xiaodong Du, Dermot J. Hayes, Mindy L. BakerOctober 2008 [08-WP 480]
This study estimates the welfare changes for consumers and producers resulting from ethanol production and related support polices in 2007. The results suggest a positive welfare gain from the support policies; this is possible because ethanol subsidies effectively replaced a market distortion that had a larger deadweight loss. Previous farm subsidies created overproduction, which then depressed market prices and increased the cost of maintaining target-price supports. Ethanol polices resulted in additional ethanol production, but because this additional ethanol was sold in price elastic energy markets, the price depressing impact of the government supports was less than before. This resulted in lower government spending and a net welfare gain of $2.65 billion for given market parameters. The results are...(complete news release and link to study here).
Labels:
agriculture,
alternative energy,
bio-fuels,
economics,
energy,
ethanol,
Farm Subsidies
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Green Refinery?
New technology is coming quickly that will revolutionize the way we manufacture fuel. Here is another example.
'Green refinery' would be a first
Plant's aim is to capture carbon emissions
'Green refinery' would be a first
Plant's aim is to capture carbon emissions
Friday, October 10, 2008
Offshore Texas Wind Power Delayed
Wind power development in the Gulf of Mexico is facing a different set of challenges than onshore developments in Texas. To its advantage, it would have much fewer miles for transmitting the power to population centers. On the downside, it is much more expensive to develop and infrastructure to transmit it is more expensive. There is also the threat of hurricanes.
A Few Snags, But Hopes Are Still High for Offshore Wind in Texas
The word on the street is that the Lehman failure has put a halt to T. Boone Pickens wind development plans as well. It's just a rumor -- don't quote me on it.
A Few Snags, But Hopes Are Still High for Offshore Wind in Texas
The word on the street is that the Lehman failure has put a halt to T. Boone Pickens wind development plans as well. It's just a rumor -- don't quote me on it.
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
Texas,
wind power
Wind Power on the Reservation
I think it's wonderful that the Indian tribes want to get in on the wind power boom. The biggest problem they face is that most reservation lands are far from population centers where the power is needed. Infrastructure to transport that power into the grids where it can be utilized will be an issue.
Along with their bid for wind power, they might consider trying to attract industry that can utilize that power. New industry would provide badly needed jobs for the reservations. Instead of "take the power to industry" they might look at "bring industry to the power."
Indian Tribes See Profit in Harnessing the Wind for Power
Along with their bid for wind power, they might consider trying to attract industry that can utilize that power. New industry would provide badly needed jobs for the reservations. Instead of "take the power to industry" they might look at "bring industry to the power."
Indian Tribes See Profit in Harnessing the Wind for Power
Labels:
alternative energy,
energy,
industry,
infrastructure,
wind power
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)